Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Clash of Camelot
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 35,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Great Ghosts!
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 40,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Clash of Camelot vs Great Ghosts!
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.50% — Great Ghosts! is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 35,000× against 40,000×, with Great Ghosts! higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Clash of Camelot vs Nitro Nights
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.28% against 96.31%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 35,000× against 15,000×, with Clash of Camelot higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nitro Nights does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Nitro Nights returns more in theory over the long run, while Clash of Camelot reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
