Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.11% — Count Jokula is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,500× against 2,500×, with House of Doom higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Count Jokula returns more in theory over the long run, while House of Doom reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Count Jokula is Fixed paylines, Owls is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.25% against 96.22%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,500× and 1,374×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Owls does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)