Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Demon
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Rise of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Demon vs Rise of Dead
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.53%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Demon vs Great Game Rockies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.33% — Demon is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Demon returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Game Rockies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
