Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dragon Ship
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 40,160×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Double Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Dragon Ship vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Dragon Ship vs Double Fortune
- Different format families: Dragon Ship is Fixed paylines, Double Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.22% — Double Fortune is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 40,160× against 100,000×, with Double Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Double Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
