Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Dragonfate's Favor

Play’n GO

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
30,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

The Dragon Tiger

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.53%
Volatility
High
Win cap
18,125×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Supreme Zeus

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.39%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
12,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Greek myth

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Dragonfate's Favor vs The Dragon Tiger

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.53% — The Dragon Tiger is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 30,000× against 18,125×, with Dragonfate's Favor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Dragon Tiger returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragonfate's Favor reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Dragonfate's Favor vs Supreme Zeus

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.4×: 30,000× against 12,500×, with Dragonfate's Favor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Supreme Zeus returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragonfate's Favor reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)