Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Enchanted Meadow
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.24% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 40.0×: 100,000× against 2,500×, with Enchanted Meadow higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
