Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Booongo

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Fruits Fever 5 lines does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Fruits Fever 5 lines does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Energoonz is Fixed paylines, Chicky Run is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.69% against 96.00% — Energoonz is 0.69 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 4.8×: 15× against 72×, with Chicky Run higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Chicky Run does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Energoonz returns more in theory over the long run, while Chicky Run reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)