Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.36% against 96.36%.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.10% — Fangs & Fire is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 60,000× against 54,391×, with Fangs & Fire higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Disturbed does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)