Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fangs & Fire
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 60,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mummy's Jewels 100
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.50% — Mummy's Jewels 100 is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 60,000× against 30,000×, with Fangs & Fire higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mummy's Jewels 100 returns more in theory over the long run, while Fangs & Fire reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
