Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fat Frankies
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Monkey Warrior
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,080×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Money on Reels
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fat Frankies vs Monkey Warrior
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.50% — Monkey Warrior is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,000× and 6,080×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Fat Frankies vs Money on Reels
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.21%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
