Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Fire Joker Blitz

Play’n GO

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.29%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
6,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Outsourced

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.08%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Break Away Max

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
Not published
Reels
6
Theme signals
Sports
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Fire Joker Blitz vs Outsourced

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.08% — Fire Joker Blitz is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 6,000× against 5,000×, with Fire Joker Blitz higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.

Fire Joker Blitz vs Break Away Max

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Break Away Max does not publish one.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)