Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Forge of Fortunes
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon’s Loot Link&Win 4Tune™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fortune Dragon
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Forge of Fortunes vs Dragon’s Loot Link&Win 4Tune™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.24%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Forge of Fortunes vs Fortune Dragon
- Different format families: Forge of Fortunes is Fixed paylines, Fortune Dragon is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.74% — Fortune Dragon is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Dragon does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
