Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Fortune Teller

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.08%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Lucky New Year

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.00%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
2,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Double Fortune

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.22%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
100,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Fortune Teller vs Lucky New Year

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.00% — Fortune Teller is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 500.0×: 5× against 2,500×, with Lucky New Year higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fortune Teller returns more in theory over the long run, while Lucky New Year reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Fortune Teller vs Double Fortune

  • Different format families: Fortune Teller is Fixed paylines, Double Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.22% — Double Fortune is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 20000.0×: 5× against 100,000×, with Double Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Double Fortune does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)