Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 4,000× against 2,500×, with Fox Mayhem higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Fox Mayhem reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Different format families: Fox Mayhem is Fixed paylines, Lucky Piggy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.79% — Lucky Piggy is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 4,000× against 20,000×, with Lucky Piggy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Piggy does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)