Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fox Mayhem
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS
Fate's Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Piggy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.79%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fox Mayhem vs Fate's Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Fate's Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Fox Mayhem vs Lucky Piggy
- Different format families: Fox Mayhem is Fixed paylines, Lucky Piggy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.79% — Lucky Piggy is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 4,000× against 20,000×, with Lucky Piggy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Piggy does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
