Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gemix 100
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Gemix 2
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.26%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.26% — Gemix 2 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.3×: 25,000× against 7,500×, with Gemix 100 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gemix 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while Gemix 100 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
