Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Gerard's Gambit

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
3,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Magic Piggy OG

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy, Animals

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Gerard's Gambit higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Gerard's Gambit reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)