Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Golden Ticket
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.69%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 15×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Splash of Riches
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Mermaid Riches
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Golden Ticket vs Splash of Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.69% against 96.02% — Golden Ticket is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Golden Ticket vs Mermaid Riches
- Different format families: Golden Ticket is Fixed paylines, Mermaid Riches is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.69% against 96.71%.
- Win caps differ by about 1333.3×: 15× against 20,000×, with Mermaid Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mermaid Riches does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
