Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Happy Halloween
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Zombie Blasters
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.75% — Zombie Blasters is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Happy Halloween higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Zombie Blasters does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Zombie Blasters returns more in theory over the long run, while Happy Halloween reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
