Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Holy Moo! Extreme Power
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
12 Skulls of the Dead
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.00% — Holy Moo! Extreme Power is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 3,000×, with Holy Moo! Extreme Power higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
