Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.52% — Extra Juicy is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 50,000× against 60,000×, with Extra Juicy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Different format families: Honey Rush 100 is Fixed paylines, Candy Superwin is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.73% — Candy Superwin is 0.53 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Superwin does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)