Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Hooligan Hustle
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.21% — Hooligan Hustle is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hooligan Hustle returns more in theory over the long run, while Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
