Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.08% — Hugo Carts is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 25,000× against 30,000×, with Cowboy Coins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hugo Carts returns more in theory over the long run, while Cowboy Coins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.23% against 96.20%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,313×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Dead Men Walking does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hugo Carts returns more in theory over the long run, while Dead Men Walking reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)