Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ice Joker
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Shining Hot 100
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.32%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.32% — Shining Hot 100 is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Ice Joker higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Shining Hot 100 returns more in theory over the long run, while Ice Joker reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
