Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Irish Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,250×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Irish Gold vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Irish Gold vs Great Game Rockies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.33% — Great Game Rockies is 1.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,250× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Great Game Rockies returns more in theory over the long run, while Irish Gold reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
