Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Iron Girl
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25×
- Reels
- 25
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Aztec Idols
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 33×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Flowers
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.32%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Iron Girl vs Aztec Idols
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.70% against 96.65%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 25× against 33×, with Aztec Idols higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Iron Girl returns more in theory over the long run, while Aztec Idols reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Iron Girl vs Flowers
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.70% against 96.32% — Iron Girl is 0.38 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Flowers does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
