Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jade Magician
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fantasy
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Hatch
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.83%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jade Magician vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Jade Magician vs Dragon Hatch
- Different format families: Jade Magician is Fixed paylines, Dragon Hatch is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.83% — Dragon Hatch is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Hatch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
