Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.07% — Money Dragon is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Different format families: Jewel Box is Fixed paylines, Coins of Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.48% — Coins of Fortune is 0.70 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 8,781× against 6,015×, with Jewel Box higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Coins of Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Jewel Box reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)