Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Keno
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 90.83%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Truth
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Prosperity Lanterns
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Keno vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Keno does not publish a rating.
Keno vs Prosperity Lanterns
- Different format families: Keno is Fixed paylines, Prosperity Lanterns is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 90.83% against 96.77% — Prosperity Lanterns is 5.94 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Keno does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
