Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Keno
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 90.83%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rally 4 Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.01%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Truth
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Keno vs Rally 4 Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 90.83% against 92.01% — Rally 4 Riches is 1.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Keno does not publish a rating.
Keno vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Keno does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
