Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Kiss Reels of Rock
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Testament
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Kiss Reels of Rock vs Testament
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 50,000× against 20,000×, with Kiss Reels of Rock higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Testament returns more in theory over the long run, while Kiss Reels of Rock reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Kiss Reels of Rock vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
