Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lady of Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.78%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 8,781×
- Reels
- 781
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Jewel Box
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.78%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 8,781×
- Reels
- 781
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Dragon Tribe
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 27,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lady of Fortune vs Jewel Box
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 95.78% against 95.78%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 8,781× and 8,781×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lady of Fortune vs Dragon Tribe
- Different format families: Lady of Fortune is Fixed paylines, Dragon Tribe is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.07% — Dragon Tribe is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.1×: 8,781× against 27,000×, with Dragon Tribe higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Tribe does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
