Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Legacy of Gems Blitzways
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Book of Golden Sands
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.46% — Book of Golden Sands is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Legacy of Gems Blitzways higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Book of Golden Sands returns more in theory over the long run, while Legacy of Gems Blitzways reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
