Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.62% against 96.33% — Mahjong 88 is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mahjong 88 returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Game Rockies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Mahjong 88 is Fixed paylines, Fortune Rabbit is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.62% against 96.75% — Fortune Rabbit is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Rabbit does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Dragon Tribe Nolimit City42%