Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mahjong 88
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.62%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mahjong 88 vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Mahjong 88 vs Great Game Rockies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.62% against 96.33% — Mahjong 88 is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mahjong 88 returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Game Rockies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
