Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 9,000× and 9,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.17%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 9,000× against 7,800×, with Manta Mayhem higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Add to the comparison (up to four)