Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.17% against 96.20%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Matsuri higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Matsuri reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.17% against 96.23% — Ice Joker is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,000× and 3,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Add to the comparison (up to four)