Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Medusa's Madness
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Rise of Olympus
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.59% against 96.50% — Medusa's Madness is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 2,000× against 5,000×, with Rise of Olympus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Medusa's Madness returns more in theory over the long run, while Rise of Olympus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Greek myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
