Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Merlin: Journey of Flame
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Aladdin and the Sorcerer
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,532×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.28% against 96.23%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 7,500× against 6,532×, with Merlin: Journey of Flame higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
