Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Merry Xmas
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.78%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 8,781×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Grug Make Fire
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Massive Gold
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Merry Xmas vs Grug Make Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.19% — Grug Make Fire is 0.41 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 8,781× against 10,000×, with Grug Make Fire higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grug Make Fire does not publish a rating.
Merry Xmas vs Massive Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.00% — Massive Gold is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




