Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Moon Princess Stargazing
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Grug Make Fire
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Moon Princess Stargazing vs Grug Make Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.19%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grug Make Fire does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Moon Princess Stargazing returns more in theory over the long run, while Grug Make Fire reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Moon Princess Stargazing vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)





