Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Moon Princess Stargazing

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
High
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Sci-fi & neon
Free demo available →
VS

Cosmic Cash

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.56%
Volatility
High
Win cap
2,650×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sci-fi & neon, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Space Donkey

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.07%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
14,649×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sci-fi & neon
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Moon Princess Stargazing vs Cosmic Cash

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.56% — Cosmic Cash is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 3.8×: 10,000× against 2,650×, with Moon Princess Stargazing higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: High.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cosmic Cash returns more in theory over the long run, while Moon Princess Stargazing reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Moon Princess Stargazing vs Space Donkey

  • Different format families: Moon Princess Stargazing is Fixed paylines, Space Donkey is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.07% — Moon Princess Stargazing is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 10,000× against 14,649×, with Space Donkey higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Space Donkey does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Moon Princess Stargazing returns more in theory over the long run, while Space Donkey reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)