Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mount M
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 13,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Fire Stampede Ultimate
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.45%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.45% — Fire Stampede Ultimate is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 13,000× and 12,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fire Stampede Ultimate returns more in theory over the long run, while Mount M reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
