Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mystery Joker 6000
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Agent of Hearts
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Medusa II
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 94.96%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mystery Joker 6000 vs Agent of Hearts
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 94.21% against 96.25% — Agent of Hearts is 2.04 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5× and 5×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Mystery Joker 6000 vs Medusa II
- Different format families: Mystery Joker 6000 is Fixed paylines, Medusa II is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 94.21% against 94.96% — Medusa II is 0.75 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 400.0×: 5× against 2,000×, with Medusa II higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Medusa II does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
