Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Myth
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 336,660×
- Reels
- 660
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Gold Trophy 2
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 336,660×
- Reels
- 660
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Mythical Guardians
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Myth vs Gold Trophy 2
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.88% against 96.88%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 336,660× and 336,660×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Myth vs Mythical Guardians
- Different format families: Myth is Fixed paylines, Mythical Guardians is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.76% — Myth is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 22.4×: 336,660× against 15,000×, with Myth higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mythical Guardians does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Greek myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
