Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Myth of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Horror
VS
Frankenstein
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Myth of Dead vs Frankenstein
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.19%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Myth of Dead vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Myth of Dead higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Myth of Dead reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
