Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.84% — 888 Dragons is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 67× against 100×, with 888 Dragons higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against Low. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Different format families: Ninja Fruits is Fixed paylines, Dragon Tiger Luck is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.94% — Dragon Tiger Luck is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 67× against 200×, with Dragon Tiger Luck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Tiger Luck does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)