Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Octopus Treasure
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.26%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.26% against 96.20% — Octopus Treasure is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 5,000× against 9,000×, with Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Octopus Treasure returns more in theory over the long run, while Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
