Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.10% — Odin Protector of Realms is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Norse myth.

Different format families: Odin Protector of Realms is Fixed paylines, Thor Hammer Time is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.03% — Odin Protector of Realms is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 5,000× against 2,328×, with Odin Protector of Realms higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Norse myth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)