Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Odin Protector of Realms
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.40% — Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,500×, with Odin Protector of Realms higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding returns more in theory over the long run, while Odin Protector of Realms reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
